Writing Docs That Other Engineers Will Actually Read
Writing Docs That Other Engineers Will Actually Read
In the fast-paced world of software engineering, documentation often feels like a chore shoved to the bottom of the to-do list. But let's be real: if you're building systems in a Nigerian tech scene buzzing with startups in Lagos or remote teams spanning Abuja to Enugu, good docs can be the difference between smooth collaboration and endless Slack pings at 2 a.m. I've been there, knee-deep in a fintech project where unclear docs meant our backend setup confused half the team, leading to delays that cost us a client pitch. The truth is, most engineers skim docs - if they read them at all. So how do you write ones they'll actually engage with? It's about ditching perfectionism and focusing on what sticks.
Know Who You're Writing For - And What They Really Need
Your docs aren't a novel for literary critics; they're tools for busy engineers solving real problems. Start by picturing your reader: maybe a junior dev in a Yaba tech hub, juggling multiple gigs, or a senior engineer in Port Harcourt debugging a mobile app under tight deadlines. They don't have time for fluff. Tailor your writing to their pain points.
Take a scenario from a typical Nigerian e-commerce platform. You're documenting an API endpoint for inventory updates. The reader might be integrating it into a Flutter app for Android users across the country, dealing with spotty network in rural areas. Don't bury the essential params in a wall of theory. Lead with: 'To update stock levels, send a POST to /api/inventory with JSON body {productId, quantity, warehouseId}. Expect a 200 OK on success or 409 if stock is locked.' That's the hook. Then, if needed, add a quick example response.
Actionable tip: Before writing, jot down three questions your reader likely has. For that API doc, they might wonder: How do I handle authentication? What if the warehouseId is invalid? Does this support bulk updates? Answer those first. In my experience working on a Lagos-based payment gateway, skipping this step led to docs that got ignored because they didn't address the 'how' behind our unreliable telecom integrations.
This approach builds trust. Engineers in Nigeria's collaborative spaces, like co-working spots in Ikeja, often share code across teams with varying experience levels. By anticipating needs, your docs become a reliable shortcut, not another hurdle.
Make It Scannable - Because No One Reads Walls of Text
Attention spans are short, especially when you're troubleshooting during load shedding or coordinating with time zone differences in a distributed team. The key? Structure for skimming. Use short paragraphs, bullet points, and bold key terms. Avoid dense prose that requires a PhD to parse.
Consider docs for deploying a microservice on AWS, adapted for a Nigerian SaaS company mindful of forex fluctuations and local data regs. Instead of a rambling intro on cloud architecture, hit them with:
Prerequisites: Docker installed, AWS CLI configured with IAM role having EC2 and RDS permissions. Note: Use free tier to avoid naira-draining costs.
Steps:
Build image: docker build -t myapp .
Push to ECR: aws ecr get-login-password | docker login... (keep commands crisp).
Deploy: kubectl apply -f deployment.yaml.
Common Gotchas: If pods fail, check logs with kubectl logs -f podname. In Nigeria, watch for VPN issues accessing AWS console during peaks.
This format lets readers jump to what's relevant. I once revamped docs for a health tech app this way, and feedback from devs in Abuja showed they found fixes 40% faster - no exaggeration, just from making it glanceable.
Pro tip: Frontload the most critical info. Put setup commands in the first section, troubleshooting last. And use active voice: 'Run the script' beats 'The script should be run.' It's direct, like giving directions in heavy Lagos traffic - clear and to the point.
Use Real Examples, Not Abstract Theory
Abstract explanations gather dust. Engineers learn by doing, so embed concrete examples that mirror real workflows. In Nigeria's booming agritech sector, where apps track farm yields amid erratic rains, docs need to feel grounded.
Suppose you're writing about a database migration script for a crop monitoring system. Don't say 'Migrate schema using Alembic.' Show it:
Here's a sample migration for adding a 'rainfall' column:
-- In your migration file: alter table crops add column rainfall decimal(5,2); update crops set rainfall = 0 where rainfall is null;
Then explain: Run alembic upgrade head from your terminal. Test on a staging DB first, especially if your team's using shared Heroku instances to cut costs.
This specificity resonates. Early in my career at a Nigerian edtech startup, I documented a user auth flow with a step-by-step curl example simulating a login from a low-bandwidth connection. It clicked for the frontend team in Kano, who were battling mobile data limits, and reduced back-and-forth queries by half.
When weaving in examples, draw from local realities: Mention testing on MTN or Glo sims for API latency, or how to doc error handling for power outages interrupting cron jobs. It makes your writing relatable, turning docs into trusted allies rather than forgotten files.
Cut the Jargon - Explain Terms as You Go
Tech lingo is a barrier, especially in diverse teams where English might be a second language or accents vary across regions. Assume your reader is smart but not omniscient. Define terms inline without patronizing.
For instance, in docs on setting up Kafka for real-time transaction alerts in a banking app - vital for Nigeria's cashless push - say: 'Kafka is a distributed streaming platform (think message queue on steroids) that handles high-throughput data. To start a broker: bin/kafka-server-start.sh config/server.properties.' No assuming everyone knows what a 'topic' is; slip in 'Topics are like categorized channels for your messages.'
I learned this the hard way during a project for a ride-hailing service in Ibadan. Our initial docs tossed around 'idempotency' without context, confusing juniors who thought it was a new library. After clarifying - 'Idempotency means running the same request multiple times yields the same result, key for flaky networks' - adoption soared.
Actionable advice: After drafting, read aloud. If a sentence trips you, simplify. Tools like Grammarly can help, but nothing beats a fresh pair of eyes from a colleague in another city.
Iterate and Update - Docs Aren't Set in Stone
Great docs evolve. In Nigeria's dynamic tech landscape, where regulations like NDPR shift and tools like Flutter update monthly, stale docs breed frustration.
Build a habit: Tag versions, like 'v1.2 - Updated for Python 3.10.' Link to changelog. For a logistics app tracking deliveries in Benin City, we added a note: 'Post-July 2023: Integrate with new NIPOST API for address validation.' This kept things current amid postal reforms.
Encourage feedback: End docs with 'Questions? Ping me on Slack or file an issue.' It fosters ownership. In one team I led, this loop turned passive readers into contributors, improving docs organically.
Wrapping It Up: Actionable Steps to Better Docs
Writing docs that get read boils down to empathy and brevity. Start small: Next time you code, draft a one-pager on your changes. Share it in your next standup.
Audit existing docs: Skim as if you're new - what's missing?
Prototype with examples: Use a local scenario, like deploying on a budget VPS.
Test readability: Get a peer review, ideally from outside your immediate team.
Schedule updates: Block 30 minutes bi-weekly to refresh.
In the end, effective docs save time and sanity in our vibrant but challenging Nigerian tech ecosystem. They bridge gaps, whether it's coordinating across states or scaling startups. Write like you're helping a friend debug over garri and soup - clear, helpful, and human. Your fellow engineers will thank you, probably with fewer frustrated emojis in chat.
Comments (0)
Join the conversation